Residentie Orchestra The Hague, Matthias Bamert - Dopper: Symphony No. 2 (2001) CD-Rip
BAND/ARTIST: Residentie Orchestra The Hague, Matthias Bamert
- Title: Dopper: Symphony No. 2
- Year Of Release: 2001
- Label: Chandos
- Genre: Classical
- Quality: FLAC (image+.cue,log,scans)
- Total Time: 65:08
- Total Size: 311 mb
- WebSite: Album Preview
Tracklist:
Cornelis Dopper (1870-1939)
1. Second Sym in B: I. Andante, Molto Moderato - Allegro Con Brio
2. Second Sym in B: II. Allegro Vivace, a la Burla
3. Second Sym in B: III. Adagio Sostenuto
4. Second Sym in B: IV. Rondo. Allegro Molto, Energico
5. Paan I in D: Allegro
6. Paan II in F: Allegro Moderato
Performers:
Residentie Orchestra The Hague
Matthias Bamert - conductor
Cornelis Dopper (1870-1939)
1. Second Sym in B: I. Andante, Molto Moderato - Allegro Con Brio
2. Second Sym in B: II. Allegro Vivace, a la Burla
3. Second Sym in B: III. Adagio Sostenuto
4. Second Sym in B: IV. Rondo. Allegro Molto, Energico
5. Paan I in D: Allegro
6. Paan II in F: Allegro Moderato
Performers:
Residentie Orchestra The Hague
Matthias Bamert - conductor
The Dutch are way too hard on themselves. So far, Chandos has released three discs (including this one) in its ongoing Dutch composers series featuring the Residentie Orchestra of The Hague, and all three have been excellent (you can find reviews of the first two discs, music by Hol and Voormolen, by entering Q1409 and Q1545 in the ClassicsToday.com search box under album/work title). And yet, the writer of the booklet notes treats this music as if listening to it were some kind of penance. He should take a lesson from his English colleagues, who indiscriminately promote any piece of native trash as God’s gift to the world of music. Well, maybe he needn’t go quite that far.
Cornelis Dopper’s reputation today rests on his being second conductor (under Mengelberg) of the Concertgebouw Orchestra in the early decades of the last century. He deserves better. His music belongs squarely in the tradition of the late Romantic “second tier”–composers like Bax, Elgar, Bantock, Zemlinsky, Pfitzner, Magnard, Chadwick, Dreiseke, Melartin, and that sort. It’s not music that “matters” historically, but it’s colorful, well written, enjoyable, sometimes masterful, and we’re better off for having it available.
The Second Symphony (1903) suffers slightly from that Romantic curse, the “finale problem”. The ruggedly “symphonic” first movement impressively sustains its 14-minute length, developing memorable thematic material with energy and apt musical logic. The witty scherzo sports some charming faux folk-tunes and gains immeasurably in sparkle and freshness thanks to highly imaginative percussion scoring, including prominent castanets. Dopper’s remarkably ethereal (and never tacky) writing for harp and strings at the beginning of the enchanting slow movement offers further eloquent proof of his sensitivity to subtle instrumental colors.
The finale, although certainly not poor, returns to the more “symphonic” style of the first movement, and while the cymbals and brass do weigh in at the end for an impressive peroration, the greater instrumental brilliance of the two central movements casts a shadow over this last one that it never quite shrugs off. Still, if you take a shine to works such as Elgar’s First Symphony, which has similar strengths and weaknesses, you’ll like this piece very much. Dopper wrote seven symphonies in all, and I’d be very curious to know how the others sound, and in particular if he eventually solved the “finale problem” in his later efforts.
The two works entitled Päan I and II (the title means “paean”) sound almost exactly like Bax in Celtic march mode, though the scoring has more transparency. Dopper’s comparative harmonic astringency in these later pieces proves that his style did indeed develop, and only whets the appetite for more. Matthias Bamert directs his Dutch forces with confidence, and they play beautifully, as if they’ve known this music for years. Fine sound, too. Now why can’t some enterprising Dutch label pick up where Chandos is leading and explore this rewarding musical heritage in greater depth?
Cornelis Dopper’s reputation today rests on his being second conductor (under Mengelberg) of the Concertgebouw Orchestra in the early decades of the last century. He deserves better. His music belongs squarely in the tradition of the late Romantic “second tier”–composers like Bax, Elgar, Bantock, Zemlinsky, Pfitzner, Magnard, Chadwick, Dreiseke, Melartin, and that sort. It’s not music that “matters” historically, but it’s colorful, well written, enjoyable, sometimes masterful, and we’re better off for having it available.
The Second Symphony (1903) suffers slightly from that Romantic curse, the “finale problem”. The ruggedly “symphonic” first movement impressively sustains its 14-minute length, developing memorable thematic material with energy and apt musical logic. The witty scherzo sports some charming faux folk-tunes and gains immeasurably in sparkle and freshness thanks to highly imaginative percussion scoring, including prominent castanets. Dopper’s remarkably ethereal (and never tacky) writing for harp and strings at the beginning of the enchanting slow movement offers further eloquent proof of his sensitivity to subtle instrumental colors.
The finale, although certainly not poor, returns to the more “symphonic” style of the first movement, and while the cymbals and brass do weigh in at the end for an impressive peroration, the greater instrumental brilliance of the two central movements casts a shadow over this last one that it never quite shrugs off. Still, if you take a shine to works such as Elgar’s First Symphony, which has similar strengths and weaknesses, you’ll like this piece very much. Dopper wrote seven symphonies in all, and I’d be very curious to know how the others sound, and in particular if he eventually solved the “finale problem” in his later efforts.
The two works entitled Päan I and II (the title means “paean”) sound almost exactly like Bax in Celtic march mode, though the scoring has more transparency. Dopper’s comparative harmonic astringency in these later pieces proves that his style did indeed develop, and only whets the appetite for more. Matthias Bamert directs his Dutch forces with confidence, and they play beautifully, as if they’ve known this music for years. Fine sound, too. Now why can’t some enterprising Dutch label pick up where Chandos is leading and explore this rewarding musical heritage in greater depth?
As a ISRA.CLOUD's PREMIUM member you will have the following benefits:
- Unlimited high speed downloads
- Download directly without waiting time
- Unlimited parallel downloads
- Support for download accelerators
- No advertising
- Resume broken downloads