• logo

Karl Richter & Munchener Bach-Orchester - Bach: Brandenburg Concertos - Concertos BWV 1055 & 1060 [2CD Remastered Set] (1989)

Karl Richter & Munchener Bach-Orchester - Bach: Brandenburg Concertos - Concertos BWV 1055 & 1060 [2CD Remastered Set] (1989)

BAND/ARTIST: Karl Richter & Munchener Bach-Orchester

  • Title: Bach: Brandenburg Concertos - Concertos BWV 1055 & 1060
  • Year Of Release: 1989
  • Label: Archiv Produktion [427 143-2]
  • Genre: Classical, Baroque
  • Quality: WAV (image+.cue,log,scans)
  • Total Time: 2:05:40
  • Total Size: 1.33 gb
  • WebSite:
Better than most, Karl Richter knew that the Brandenburg Concertos are serious fun and ought to be played that way. There is a sense of joy in these wry readings, of something elevated but at the same time earthy and jaunty and not too pious, that still delights after a quarter of a century-- and nowhere does one get a better feeling for the extraordinary efflorescence of Bach's genius. The accounts are briskly paced and soloistic in approach, with every participant freely involoved. While the intonation is at times a little less than precise, the overall effect is delightfully fresh and musical; and the recordings scarcely show their age. --Ted Libbey

::TRACKLISTING::

Concerto No. 1 In F Major BWV 1046
1-01 [Without Tempo Indication] 3:38
1-02 Adagio 3:46
1-03 Allegro 4:20
1-04 Menuetto - Trio 1 - Polacca - Trio 2 7:28

Concerto No. 2 In F Major BWV 1047
1-05 [Without Tempo Indication] 4:44
1-06 Andante 3:42
1-07 Allegro Assai 2:36

Concerto No. 3 In G Major BWV 1048
1-08 [Without Tempo Indication] 5:23
1-09 Adagio 0:51
1-10 Allegro 4:59

Concerto No. 4 In G Major BWV 1049
1-11 Allegro 7:18
1-12 Andante 3:53
1-13 Presto 4:53

Concerto No. 5 In D Major BWV 1050
2-01 Allegro 9:58
2-02 Affettuoso 5:04
2-03 Allegro 5:23

Concerto No. 6 In B Flat Major BWV 1051
2-04 [Without Tempo Indication] 6:15
2-05 Adagio Ma Non Tanto 4:59
2-06 Allegro 5:49

Concerto For Oboe D'Amore, Strings And Basso Continuo In A Major, After BWV 1055
2-07 [Without Tempo Indication] 5:10
2-08 Larghetto 5:03
2-09 Allegro Ma Non Tanto 4:51

Concerto For Violin, Oboe, Strings And Basso Continuo In D Minor, After BWV 1060
2-10 Allegro 5:20
2-11 Adagio 5:33
2-12 Allegro 3:37

Classical | FLAC / APE | CD-Rip

As a ISRA.CLOUD's PREMIUM member you will have the following benefits:
  • Unlimited high speed downloads
  • Download directly without waiting time
  • Unlimited parallel downloads
  • Support for download accelerators
  • No advertising
  • Resume broken downloads
  • User offline
  • olga1001
  •  wrote in 12:55
    • Like
    • 0
If I feel difference between PCM (WAV) and lossless compression (FLAC, APE, WavPack...) on same sound level about same CD, is it because of ability of Player or Amplifier ?
Thanks
quote
  • User offline
  • Merry-Go-Round
  •  wrote in 12:03
    • Like
    • 1
@olga1001: WAV is the original PCM signal from example a CD. It's not compressed, it's a 1:1 copy. FLAC is a compressed audio file but lossless. It retains all the bits of the original recording but in a smaller file. I you want to store a lot of music, FLAC is the prefered file format. I use EAC for ripping and Foobar2000 for playback. Setting up EAC and Foobar2000 correctly is equally important for perfect playback. If you hear a difference between WAV and FLAC, it probably has to do with the software you have installed.
quote
  • User offline
  • olga1001
  •  wrote in 15:51
    • Like
    • 0
@Merry-Go-Round
Thanks for the tip.
Time and load to computer on decompression affect sound quality accompanying more electromagnetic wave, I think.
Why FLAC has 10 level's compressions (lossless uncompressed & from 0 to 8) ?
If same sound quality is ensured, there should be no need for so many levels only because of capacity.
Application developer may have noticed difference.
And HDD & SSD have obviously different sound qualities with same source & same player.
By the way do your ears sometimes feel difference ?
Thanks
quote
  • User offline
  • Merry-Go-Round
  •  wrote in 19:04
    • Like
    • 0
@olga1001: it's not clear what level of compression is the best. What is shure: the more compression, the longer it takes to covert to FLAC. If sound quality has your highest priority, then check if your PC/laptop has a Digital Output (Optical/Coaxial) and use a Digital to Analogue Converter (Like the Cambridge Audio DACMagic 100). Then connect the anlogue Audio Out to your Amplifier. A winner!
quote
  • User offline
  • olga1001
  •  wrote in 20:32
    • Like
    • 0
@Merry-Go-Round
Thanks again.
My system isn't so high but just switching USB cable from PC to DAC causes difference of sound in spite of the same data.
Such a thing happens among various compressions, I think.
Fortunately this is WAV, you can compress it only with 1 step and compare.
The best sound I think is no compression and SSD but not economical, if so much money, I'll renew my audio system :p
I use what is on internet without decompressing to WAV nor less compression.
Thanks
quote